QUARTERLY LETTER
Published Third Quarter 1988
Muhlenkamp
Memorandum 5
The U.S. economy continues to hum along
nicely. Consumer spending is moderating a bit, but is offset
by strong exports. The fall in the dollar since 1985 has helped
limit imports and boost exports, which is why we continue
to think the trade deficit will fix itself. An improving trend
in the trade deficit is now apparent; the strengthening dollar
reflects this.
In terms of the Federal budget deficit,
nothing is being done and probably nothing will be done until
after November. Even then, we may not do much. The electorate
has narrowed the political choices to those who have made
the fewest promises to change things. If you adopt the thermostat
theory of elections (we only get up to change things when
we're uncomfortable), it implies things won't change much
because the public is comfortable.
Wall Street's mood has shifted from fears
of depression after the October crash to current fears of
a near boom and inflation. We are sure that some individuals
have realized these fears (such as those investors who sold
last October, either because they were on margin or panicked).
But, in the aggregate, the public and the economy have treated
the crash as a non-event.
Charlie Smith's accompanying article on
the drought highlights some of the reasons why increased prices
in some parts of the economy do not necessarily result in
economy-wide inflation. Those who now fear inflation are looking
at the pieces, not the whole picture.
Don't get me wrong, the drought is a negative
and creates inflationary pressures. Higher employment is a
positive, but also creates inflationary pressures. Historically
high interest rates are a positive for savers and a negative
for borrowers and create disinflationary pressures. It is
normal for some parts of the economy to improve while others
suffer setbacks; that's the strength of a diverse economy.
If the response of the Fed to the above
is to create more money, we will have higher inflation. There
are; however, no current signs that it is doing so. Historically,
once elections are out of the way, Washington is more likely
to slow the economy than to stimulate it. We therefore look
for inflation to remain in the 4-5% range. If so, interest
rates should come down, making bonds attractive. Further improvement
in the trade and/or budget deficits (which would strengthen
the dollar) would help bonds as well. At these levels, the
average common stock is fairly priced, and individual stocks
should reflect the current results of the underlying companies.
Our emphasis will remain on those companies and industries
that are doing well in the mixed economy of 1988.
Read our quarterly newsletter, Muhlenkamp
Memorandum, for more by Ron Muhlenkamp.
|