QUARTERLY LETTER
Published Fourth Quarter 1999
Muhlenkamp
Memorandum 52
The Third Quarter of 1999 was brutal. The
rationalization process, which we have been describing for
a year, is taking longer than we expected. In our Second
Quarter Newsletter (Issue #50). we described the "split
personality" of the market since the fall of 1998. And
explained why (we believe) it happened. We printed a plot
of the split between consumer confidence and business confidence.
We stated that the split reflected the fear of recession by
businessmen (and by institutional investors) based on projections
by economists and broadcast by the media.
We said that we expected GDP to grow (no
recession) and the fears of recession to dissipate starting
right about then. (The updated chart of confidence levels
illustrates the point.) That part we got right. In April,
it became quite apparent that the U.S. was not entering a
recession and top name cyclical stocks soared. Alcoa, Caterpillar,
Dupont,Goodyear, International Paper and 3M were each up over
20% in the month of April alone. Meanwhile, since April a
number of "security blankets" have lost much of
their premiums. Abbott Labs, American Home Products, Clorox,
Coca Cola, Disney, Gillette and Pfizer are each down 30%.
Since April, many of the Internet stocks have lost 30-50%
of their April prices, including America-On-Line, Amazon,
Ameritrade, E-Bay, E-Trade and Mind-Spring.
So we opened our July letter with, "It's
working folks. The things we wrote about in April are happening...."
We still believe that is true, but the statement was premature.
The economy continues to expand at a healthy rate and the
data indicate that inflation is under control. But the reality
has not yet alleviated the fear of inflation. We find it interesting
that the stock market bears have been able to keep their fear,
despite a reversal of the cause from "too little"
growth to "too much" growth. The abiding fear is
that too much growth causes inflation, even though Reagan
and Volcker disproved this theory twenty years ago.
Nevertheless, for six months, we have been
dealing with the fear of rising inflation despite very little
data to support it. My observation remains that people can
hold a fear for six to nine months. Unless confirmed by data,
the fear then dissipates. We expect the fear to dissipate
between now and year-end. We find it interesting that long-term
Treasury Bonds, which should be the best market barometer
of inflation fears, bottomed in late June, in early August,
in mid-September, and again in October; each time at yields
of 6.1 - 6.4%. Another reason we expect volatile unsettled
markets through year-end is the normal year-end tax-selling
and tax-swapping activity in the marketplace.
Part of our frustration is due to the fact
that we have been right in our assessment of the economy.
Furthermore, most of our companies are meeting our expectations
and a number of "security blanket" stocks have lost
part of their premiums. Further still, a number of our stocks
have been bought, usually for cash, by competition or by management.
Many of our companies are buying in their own stock. So businessmen
are seeing the same values in our companies that we are.
|
ROE |
EPS Growth
(5-year) |
EPS Growth
(1-year) |
Sales
Growth |
P/E
Growth |
| S&P Top 15 |
30 |
23 |
15 |
10 |
41 |
| Muhlenkamp Top 15 |
21 |
25 |
24 |
15 |
14 |
| Average Company |
15 |
— |
0 |
— |
16 |
We have updated our table from April on
our top holdings. Since April, the only difference is that
our P/Es are lower now than they were then. So the values
are even greater, but so far, the public investors are not
interested. The public is playing a "momentum" game
focusing on those stocks that have had the greatest price
move lately. But the rotation among groups is rapid and the
declines can be as dramatic as the advances. In April, the
top group was Internet stocks, many of which have lost 30-50%
since then. Today, the top groups are media and telecoms that,
like the Internet stocks, are being bid up on the basis of
hope for future profitability. Not all of these hopes can
be realized. Even those companies who win the battle for the
customer will be unlikely to earn enough profit or cash flow
to justify current prices. This is why we don't own them.
Instead, we own companies that demonstrate good profitability
today, and whose stocks are modestly priced based on their
current profitability. Over the years we have found this a
much more reliable way to earn good returns. Today we're finding
more values and better values than we've found at any time
since late 1994. Our expectation is that other investors will
begin looking for these values as their fear of rising inflation
dissipates between now and year-end.
Read our quarterly newsletter, Muhlenkamp
Memorandum, for more by Ron Muhlenkamp.
|