Quarterly Letter BACK As I write this on March 31, 2003, the daily headlines, every day, focus on the war in Iraq. As long as this is true, not much else will matter in an investment sense. But the headlines themselves, and the perception of them, will give us great volatility. When President Bush made it clear that action would not be postponed indefinitely, the markets jumped over 13% (a year’s work) in just 8 days, only to give back one-third of that in the next week. It’s interesting to remember that we are also at war in Afghanistan, but that it is no longer in the headlines every day. I believe that within 5-10 weeks, the war in Iraq will either be over or will settle into a pattern that allows other items to make some of the headlines on the daily news. When that happens, the markets will respond to the following underlying factors:
We don’t know precisely when these things will occur, but we expect
it to begin within 5-10 weeks.
In the meantime, people continue to focus on the question “How low will stock prices go?” We think the more useful question is “What should stock prices be?” We believe stock prices are determined by the fundamental factors of inflation, interest rates and corporate profitability (as demonstrated in our 1979 essay Why The Market Went Down, available on our website). In any market, bear or bull, determining what stock prices should be depends on some constant, underlying questions:
Our required equity return of 8% to Key Question
#4 is derived as follows: To pay 2x book value should not require paying
for inflation twice, or the debt premium twice. It would require
earning the equity premium twice, so that an 11% ROE would be worth
approximately 2x book value. Paying 2x book value for 11-12% ROE
should return to me the required 8% over time. Note: Return on Equity (ROE) is just earnings
divided by book value (E/B), so paying 2x book value for a 12% ROE
equates to being willing to pay 16.7x earnings (P/E = P/B ¸
E/B = 2 ¸ 0.12 = 16.7) when inflation, interest rates, and
ROE are as described in the table. Today, current inflation and interest rates approximate
the numbers in the table, and the average corporate return on equity
is 12%. So we should be willing to pay 2x book value or 17x earnings
for companies with 12% ROE. (Actually, we like to buy cheap.) If
your debt and equity premiums are similar to mine, the justifiable
P/E in today’s market is 17 – as it was in 1965 (which is the last
time we had 2% inflation and 5% long-term interest rates). Of course,
if your debt and equity requirements are different from mine, you
will be willing to pay a different price for the same company. The average P/E on the S&P 500 is significantly
higher than my fair value of 17, but that is a capitalization-weighted
P/E. The unweighted median P/E of the 1700 stocks covered by Value
Line is 15, which is fair. We believe prices on average are roughly
where they should be. Some people believe that P/Es must go to 6 or
7 before the market bottoms as it did in 1982. We believe it was
high inflation that drove average P/Es to 6, as explained in Why
The Market Went Down. In 1982, inflation of 8% and long-term interest
rates of 12% required equity returns of 15% and P/Es of 6x. Today, we are recovering from a “normal cyclical
recession.” We haven’t made the governmental policy mistakes that
would give us a depression or revived inflation. So we see no economic
reason for P/Es to go to 6 or 7, and believe the secular bear market
of the 1970s is not about to be repeated. If you are wondering why the market has come down
since March 2000, read my quarterly letter in Issue
63 of the Muhlenkamp Memorandum (also
available on our website). The great stock market fad, which round-tripped
in only three years, was all about hope and hype— two of the most
expensive four-letter words I know. — Ron Muhlenkamp
The Importance of IRA Designations (Part 1 of 2) BACK In January 2003 we mailed an “IRA Designation or Change of Beneficiary Form” to all our IRA account holders and asked them to complete it and return it to us. Judging from the few responses we received, not everybody recognizes the importance of these forms. Designating a beneficiary is your opportunity to specify what you want done with your IRA money when you die. Also, designating a beneficiary provides that beneficiary the chance to preserve the tax–deferred (or tax–free in the case of a Roth IRA) compounding of investment gains in your IRA for years after your death. Tax–deferred compounding remains a powerful advantage of the IRA, and doesn’t have to end with your death. Your beneficiary designations should be incorporated into your overall estate plan. Everyone should have some form of estate plan, regardless of your age or how much money you have, so that ALL your money goes where you want it to go. Frankly, once you start planning and adding everything up, you may be surprised to realize how much money is in your estate. If you don’t provide direction on what should be done with your money after your death, then someone else will have to decide for you. That will probably be the probate courts. If you don’t have a plan for what happens to your money when you die, I suggest you start making one. Designating IRA beneficiaries is a good first step. How do you designate an
IRA Beneficiary? To designate an IRA Beneficiary:
What happens if you don’t
properly designate an IRA Beneficiary?
This means that if you die without a designated beneficiary, we will distribute your IRA to your spouse; and if your spouse isn’t living (or you don’t have a spouse) then we will distribute your IRA to your estate. Unlike the Muhlenkamp Fund, many IRA Custodians (mutual funds, banks and brokers) will skip your spouse and distribute the IRA directly to the Depositor’s estate if there is no designated beneficiary. The only way to know for sure is to read the IRA Custodial Agreement you receive from your IRA Custodian. What happens if your IRA
is distributed to your estate? Who should you designate
as your beneficiary? Most people name their spouse as the primary beneficiary, and their children as contingent beneficiaries. If your children are minors, you can make a custodial account under your state’s Uniform Gift/Transfer to Minors Act (UGMA/UTMA)1 the contingent beneficiary. (You could use a trust for the continent beneficiary instead of the minor’s UTMA, but as I said before, get legal help if you are using trusts as IRA beneficiaries. It is tricky.) Naming your children as contingent beneficiaries gives your spouse some flexibility upon your death, and also protects your heirs if your spouse dies before you and you die before updating your designated beneficiaries. What about estate taxes?
So at my death, my life insurance proceeds and non–IRA assets are put into trust, and my IRA goes to my wife. If my wife dies before I do, we have the same arrangement in place but the money moves from her to me. When the surviving spouse dies, the IRA assets go to our daughter and non–IRA assets go into the Trust. If we die together, my will stipulates that I died first so our executor can establish an order of death to use in moving assets. So when my wife and I are both gone, our daughter will have an IRA and a trust that she inherits. She controls the IRA at age 18, and she controls the Trust at age 35 (more on control issues later). This arrangement should be sufficient until we have more than two million dollars in our estate, or until our daughter turns 18, whichever comes first. Part 2 of The Importance of IRA Beneficiary Designations leads us into a discussion on estate planning. We will continue our discussion in Memorandum 67. — Anthony Muhlenkamp
The above discussion is based on Anthony Muhlenkamp’s specific situation and investment objectives. It is not intended to be investment advice or estate planning advice. Please consult your investment professional and/or tax adviser for advice concerning your particular circumstances and for any updates to the tax law. For more information about the Muhlenkamp Fund, including risks, fees and expenses, please call (800) 860-3863 to obtain a prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest. Mutual fund investing involves risk; principal loss is possible. The Muhlenkamp Fund is distributed by Announcements BACK The Wall Street Transcript Appearances BACK Pittsburgh Chapter NAIC, April 26, 2003 Las Vegas Money Show, May 13-15, 2003 Back to Basics: How to Make Money in the
Current Los Angeles Chapter, NAIC Compufest, June
27, 2003 Visit www.muhlenkamp.com or call (800) 860-3863 extension 4 for more information Published April 2003.
|
|
||||||||
| Privacy Policy | Copyrights | Disclosures | Search | |