Worker Capitalism Triumphs
Originally published in Muhlenkamp Memorandum Issue 2, October 1987, this essay points out that through pension plans, American workers own a major portion of the business assets of the United States.
As reflected in literature and the popular media from Dickens and Marx to Studs Terkel and Jesse Jackson, people have always viewed themselves as workers. As workers, they think of themselves as being in direct competition with owners and managers for a share of the wealth created by business enterprise. They see the return for their efforts in the form of a weekly or semimonthly paycheck and often conclude that their pay would be greater if only the owners took less. People naturally think in terms of net “take-home” pay, money that is then spent on the day-to-day necessities and luxuries of life. Yet take-home pay is only a part of the benefits received for work. Other items, whether deducted from gross pay, such as taxes, or those not appearing on the pay stub at all, such as medical insurance or pension benefits, are much less tangible and are often taken for granted or ignored by the worker. Yet the least tangible part of the paycheck, the pension benefit, has resulted in American workers owning a major portion of the business assets of the United States. The growth in pension and retirement assets has been so great that Peter Drucker calls wage earners “the only true capitalists in developed countries today.”
Workers Are the Owners
Today the workers are the owners; they just don’t know it yet. According to Pensions & Investments, in late 1986 the 100 largest U.S. pension funds had assets exceeding $845 billion. Of these 100 funds, only 48 were company related. The aggregate market value of the 48 sponsoring companies was $583 billion. Thus, the 100 largest pension funds could easily own all of the shares of the 48 companies. Individually, the pension funds of the employees of 14 of these companies exceeded the total market value of their respective stocks. Thus, the employees of General Motors, through their pension plan, could buy all of the stock of their company. So could the employees of AT&T, USX, Alcoa, Lockheed Martin, Union Carbide, and Delta Air Lines.
Of the 100 largest pension plans not company related, most are plans for public employees. The California Public Employees Retirement System exceeded $37 billion, an amount sufficient to buy all the stock of General Motors and Ford. Similarly, the Pennsylvania State Employees Retirement Plan could have bought out USX. The Pennsylvania School Employees Retirement Plan, at over $10 billion, could have bought out USX plus Alcoa.
The point is that workers already own a huge chunk of America’s capital assets, yet are largely unaware of it. A person retiring from USX with a $20,000 per-year pension and a life expectancy of 15 to 20 years thinks he’s poor, but if he receives the same amount in a lump sum, he thinks he’s rich. Same data-different perceptions.
Though the workers seem unaware of their ownership status, managers are rapidly becoming more aware. Directors and managers see huge blocks of “their” stock in the hands of (potentially non-friendly) pension funds and mutual funds, so they try to maintain their positions of power and influence with various “poison pills” and so-called shareholder rights plans. Managers sometimes literally buy off unfriendly holders through greenmail payments or share repurchase. Some do both. When General Motors paid $700 million in hush money to H. Ross Perot because Perot refused to keep quiet about GM’s loss of market share, the firm was besieged by its other larger shareholders, including the comptroller of the New York City Pension Funds. It seems these other shareholders were not happy with H. Ross being the only beneficiary of the firm’s largesse, so they made noises about replacing Roger Smith as chairman. GM announced a share repurchase soon thereafter.
Other firms undermine the shareholder’s say in management by creating separate classes of stock, one with the great majority of voting power, the other with very little. The trouble with this strategy is that the New York Stock Exchange has something called the “one-share, one-vote” rule, and firms opting for this strategy face delisting of their securities. Opposition to these and other corporate tactics is increasing as institutional shareholders come to recognize their collective power.
1995 Update
We wrote in 1987 that institutional shareholders and pension plans were beginning “to recognize their collective power.” Much has been made of the push in recent years for a greater focus on shareholder values, frequently resulting in corporate cutbacks, including large layoffs. But the public is unaware that the major pension plans have been aggressive drivers of this trend. Specifically, in each of the past several years, CalPERS (California Public Employee Retirement System) has targeted a number of major companies, pushing for greater efficiencies and greater profitability. Its targets have included General Motors, Eastman Kodak, Westinghouse, and so on, and its pressure has resulted in the firings of chief executives and whole tiers of corporate managers- in the name of, and for the benefit of, workers’ pensions.
2007 Update
In recent years, many companies have closed their defined benefit plans and shifted to defined contribution plans. We have seen a number of articles discussing the ramifications of such shifts, but none giving the historic causes.
A defined benefit plan is just what it says. The plan defines a benefit, say $200 a month, which is promised to be paid to a retiree beginning on some date.
The plan can be specific to a company, such as General Motors (GM), or a union bargaining group, such as the Pennsylvania Teachers or the Central States Teamsters. Administration of the plan is the responsibility of a Board of Trustees whose job it is to make sure that the plan and its assets are run for the benefit of the plan members, who are the workers and the retirees. The trustees then hire actuaries to aid in the administration of the plan. The actuaries make assumptions and calculations about life expectancies, inflation rates, wage rates, etc. in an attempt to make sure that the $200 per month will be available when needed. The fact that the future liability went from $0 to $200/month on the day the contract was signed adds an additional complication. Most firms are not able to come up with the funds overnight, so the law allows them to fund these obligations over a period of time, often 20-40 years.
Okay. So it’s 1965, your plan has been in place for 20 years. Most of the actuarial assumptions have been reasonably close. Life expectancy has increased, but the other assumptions have been close, including wage levels and returns on plan assets. Over the 20 year period, the company made annual contributions and have brought the plan to a “fully funded” level.
Now, fast forward to 1980. In the prior 15 years, because of the increase in interest rates and the decline in price/earning ratios, the return on the plan assets have not met expectations, forcing up the company contributions. Meanwhile, the company has lost market share and has had to scale back its work force just as a lot of people are about to retire. While this may sound good, it means the number of retirees is climbing rapidly while the number of active workers is declining. But the real problem is that the retirees are pointing out that (as a result of inflation) $200 per month doesn’t buy what it did 15 years ago. They’re demanding $400 per month in the upcoming wage contract. As a matter of negotiation (and as a matter of equity), the retiree benefit is doubled and the plan becomes under-funded by one-half overnight. Note that this occurred despite the best intentions of all the people involved.
The reason companies are moving to defined contribution plans is that no management can say with assurance that history won’t repeat itself. They are unwilling to risk corporate bankruptcy as a result of basic assumptions that didn’t hold up in the past and may not hold up in the future. To ask IBM or Microsoft to support a defined benefit plan today is to ask them to risk a future as problematic as that of GM and Ford today. Any management that does so is irresponsible. Figure 5.2 lists some summary data from the largest plans.
Figure 5.2 Summary Data from Largest Pension Plans
|
Assets in $ Billions |
Assets in $ Billions |
Assets in $ Billions |
Pension Plans |
1986 |
2002 |
2006 |
Top 1000 |
N/A |
4,700 |
6,487 |
Top 200 |
N/A |
3,560 |
4,911 |
Top 100 |
845 |
2,900 |
4,062 |
CalPERS |
37 |
143 |
218 |
Market Value of Top 100 Companies |
583 |
2,192 |
4,028 |
|
|
|
|
Number of public companies within Top 100 Plans |
48 |
41 |
41 |
The following data is reprinted with permission from Pensions & Investments, January 22, 2007 (Crain Communications, Inc.). Figure 5.3 lists the top 200 pension funds and their sponsors in the United States, along with the assets (in millions) in the fund. We have included a column labeled Market Value that shows the market value of the respective corporations as of September 30, 2006. When you look at the accompanying table, pay particular attention to the company market values with the asterisks. These are the companies whose (funded) pension plans are greater than the market values of the companies themselves. Note that most of the airlines have recently declared bankruptcy and that the auto companies are flirting with similar problems.
Figure 5.3 Top 200 Pension Funds/Sponsors and Market Value
| Ranked by Total Assets (in Millions as of 9/30/06) | ||||
| Rank | Sponsor | Market Value as of 9/30/06 | ||
| 1. | California Public Employees | |||
| 2. | Federal Retirement Thrift | |||
| 3. | California State Teachers | |||
| 4. | New York State Common | |||
| 5. | Florida State Board | |||
| 6. | General Motors | 18,812 | * | |
| 7. | New York City Retirement | |||
| 8. | Texas Teachers | |||
| 9. | New York State Teachers | |||
| 10. | Wisconsin Investment Board | |||
| 11. | IBM | 124,699 | ||
| 12. | General Electric | 364,415 | ||
| 13. | New Jersey | |||
| 14. | Ohio Public Employees | |||
| 15. | Boeing | 62,679 | * | |
| 16. | AT&T | 126,468 | ||
| 17. | North Carolina | |||
| 18. | Ohio State Teachers | |||
| 19. | Verizon | 107,630 | ||
| 20. | Washington State Board | |||
| 21. | Michigan Retirement | |||
| 22. | Oregon Public Employees | |||
| 23. | Pennsylvania School Employees | |||
| 24. | Ford Motor | 15,217 | * | |
| 25. | University of California | |||
| 26. | Virginia Retirement | |||
| 27. | Georgia Teachers | |||
| 28. | Minnesota State Board | |||
| 29. | Lucent Technologies | 10,488 | * | |
| 30. | Lockheed Martin | 36,478 | * | |
| 31. | Massachusetts PRIM | |||
| 32. | Colorado Employees | |||
| 33. | Illinois Teachers | |||
| 34. | Los Angeles County Employees. | |||
| 35. | Maryland State Retirement | |||
| 36. | United Nations Joint Staff | |||
| 37. | Northrop Grumman | 23,451 | * | |
| 38. | Pennsylvania Employees | |||
| 39. | Tennessee Consolidated | |||
| 40. | Teamsters, Western Conf. | |||
| 41. | National Railroad | |||
| 42. | Alabama Retirement | |||
| 43. | United Technologies | 64,074 | ||
| 44. | DaimlerChrysler | 51,074 | ||
| 45. | DuPont | 39,490 | ||
| 46. | South Carolina Retirement | |||
| 47. | Exxon Mobil | 398,907 | ||
| 48. | Missouri Public Schools | |||
| 49. | Bank of America | 242,451 | ||
| 50. | BellSouth | 77,625 | ||
| 51. | Arizona State Retirement | |||
| 52. | Texas Employees | |||
| 53. | Raytheon | 21,543 | * | |
| 54. | Connecticut Retirement | |||
| 55. | Citigroup | 245,566 | ||
| 56. | Utah State Retirement | |||
| 57. | Altria | 160,254 | ||
| 58. | JPMorgan Chase | 163,018 | ||
| 59. | United Parcel Service | 77,768 | ||
| 60. | Illinois Municipal | |||
| 61. | Honeywell | 33,495 | ||
| 62. | Iowa Public Employees | |||
| 63. | Mississippi Employees | |||
| 64. | Nevada Public Employees | |||
| 65. | Teamsters, Central States | |||
| 66. | Chevron | 142,561 | ||
| 67. | American Airlines | 4,929 | * | |
| 68. | FedEx | 33,325 | ||
| 69. | Shell Oil | 208,978 | ||
| 70. | Dow Chemical | 37,395 | ||
| 71. | Procter & Gamble | 196,792 | ||
| 72. | Alaska Retirement | |||
| 73. | State Farm | |||
| 74. | BP America | 216,907 | ||
| 75. | San Francisco City & County | |||
| 76. | 3M | 56,056 | ||
| 77. | Wells Fargo | 121,826 | ||
| 78. | Hewlett-Packard | 100,492 | ||
| 79. | Prudential | 37,134 | ||
| 80. | Kentucky Retirement | |||
| 81. | Georgia Employees | |||
| 82. | Kaiser | |||
| 83. | Illinois State Universities | |||
| 84. | United Methodist Church | |||
| 85. | Indiana Public Employees | |||
| 86. | Caterpillar | 43,148 | ||
| 87. | Texas County & District | |||
| 88. | Delphi | 899 | * | |
| 89. | Kentucky Teachers | |||
| 90. | Illinois State Board | |||
| 91. | Los Angeles Fire & Police | |||
| 92. | General Dynamics | 28,912 | ||
| 93. | Louisiana Teachers | |||
| 94. | Pfizer | 206,786 | ||
| 95. | Eastman Kodak | 6,434 | * | |
| 96. | Qwest | 16,614 | ||
| 97. | Texas Municipal Retirement | |||
| 98. | PG&E | 14,497 | ||
| 99. | Wachovia | 88,694 | ||
| 100. | National Electric | |||
| 101. | World Bank | |||
| 102. | Johnson & Johnson | 189,951 | ||
| 103. | Kansas Public Employees | |||
| 104. | Exelon | 40,531 | ||
| 105. | Alcoa | 24,308 | ||
| 106. | Deere | 19,400 | ||
| 107. | New Mexico Public Employees | |||
| 108. | Chicago Public School Teachers | |||
| 109. | International Paper | 17,076 | ||
| 110. | Merrill Lynch | 69,340 | ||
| 111. | Ohio Police & Fire | |||
| 112. | ConocoPhillips | 98,094 | ||
| 113. | MetLife | 43,042 | ||
| 114. | Consolidated Edison | 11,836 | ||
| 115. | Federal Reserve Employees | |||
| 116. | Ohio School Employees | |||
| 117. | Idaho Public Employees | |||
| 118. | Hawaii Employees | |||
| 119. | Southern Co. | 25,579 | ||
| 120. | Delta Air Lines | 270 | * | |
| 121. | Motorola | 61,251 | ||
| 122. | United States Steel | 7,099 | * | |
| 123. | Maine State Retirement | |||
| 124. | Los Angeles City Employees | |||
| 125. | Siemens | 77,614 | ||
| 126. | Northwest Airlines | 60 | * | |
| 127. | Koch Industries | |||
| 128. | Weyerhaeuser | 15,278 | ||
| 129. | Wal-Mart Stores | 205,617 | ||
| 130. | Arkansas Teachers | |||
| 131. | Sears Holdings | 24,352 | ||
| 132. | Eli Lilly | 64,433 | ||
| 133. | Operating Eng. International | |||
| 134. | Abbott Laboratories | 74,190 | ||
| 135. | 1199 SEIU National | |||
| 136. | Episcopal Church | |||
| 137. | J.C. Penney | 15,334 | ||
| 138. | New York State Def. Comp. | |||
| 139. | Morgan Stanley | 78,157 | ||
| 140. | Aetna | 21,662 | ||
| 141. | Xerox | 14,415 | ||
| 142. | National Rural Electric | |||
| 143. | PepsiCo | 107,593 | ||
| 144. | Merck | 91,180 | ||
| 145. | Southern Baptist Convention | |||
| 146. | Tennessee Valley Authority | |||
| 147. | New Mexico Educational | |||
| 148. | Oklahoma Teachers | |||
| 149. | SUPERVALU | 6,275 | * | |
| 150. | Intel | 118,648 | ||
| 151. | Boilermaker-Blacksmith | |||
| 152. | Allstate | 39,489 | ||
| 153. | Nebraska Investment Council | |||
| 154. | Indiana Teachers | |||
| 155. | Duke Energy | 37,841 | ||
| 156. | Louisiana State Employees | |||
| 157. | I.A.M. National | |||
| 158. | Time Warner | 74,141 | ||
| 159. | GlaxoSmithKline | 154,109 | ||
| 160. | Rhode Island Employees | |||
| 161. | San Diego County | |||
| 162. | Bristol-Myers Squibb | 49,006 | ||
| 163. | Electronic Data Systems | 12,692 | ||
| 164. | New York City Def. Comp. | |||
| 165. | Montana Board of Invest. | |||
| 166. | CBS | 21,994 | ||
| 167. | Unisys | 1,946 | * | |
| 168. | Presbyterian Church | |||
| 169. | Dominion Resources | 26,989 | ||
| 170. | Missouri State Employees | |||
| 171. | Cook County Employees | |||
| 172. | ITT | 9,468 | ||
| 173. | American Electric | |||
| 174. | Textron | 11,048 | ||
| 175. | South Dakota | |||
| 176. | Oklahoma Public Employees | |||
| 177. | Tyco International | 56,392 | ||
| 178. | Los Angeles Water & Power | |||
| 179. | FirstEnergy | 18,425 | ||
| 180. | Wyeth | 68,413 | ||
| 181. | Electrical Ind., Joint Board | |||
| 182. | UMWA Health & Retirement | |||
| 183. | Target | 47,443 | ||
| 184. | West Virginia Investment | |||
| 185. | Delaware Public Employees | |||
| 186. | Ohio Deferred Comp. | |||
| 187. | Southern California Edison | |||
| 188. | Orange County | |||
| 189. | Reynolds American | 18,315 | ||
| 190. | Chicago Municipal Employees | |||
| 191. | Walt Disney | 64,606 | ||
| 192. | California Savings Plus | |||
| 193. | Arizona Public Safety | |||
| 194. | Wyoming Retirement | |||
| 195. | American Express | 68,129 | ||
| 196. | Federated Department Stores | 23,487 | ||
| 197. | Hartford Financial | 26,393 | ||
| 198. | Evangelical Lutheran Church | |||
| 199. | Sacramento County | |||
| 200. | UFCW Industry, Ill. | 5,957 | ||
| * Denotes pension plan is greater than market value | ||||
Source: Reprinted with permission from Pensions & Investments, January 22, 2007; (Crain Communications, Inc.).
